2014: Problem 4

Topic: System of Masses
Concepts: Conservation of energy, Conservation of linear momentum


Solution:

1st statement: If a particle at rest explodes into 2 particles, by conserving momentum and energy we obtain

p1+p2=0\vec{p}_1+\vec{p}_2=0
K1+K2=p122m1+p222m2=KK_1+K_2=\frac{p_1^2}{2m_1}+\frac{p_2^2}{2m_2}=K

The first equation tells us the magnitudes of the momenta are equal p1=p2pp_1=p_2 \equiv p so

p22(1m1+1m2)=K\frac{p^2}{2}\left(\frac{1}{m_1}+\frac{1}{m_2}\right)=K

which can be solved for pp and then we know K1K_1 and K2K_2. In this case, we have two equations for two unknowns p1,p2p_1, p_2. For three particles, we still have these two equations for three unknowns p1,p2,p3p_1, p_2, p_3 so there is not a unique solution. Hence, N1=2N_1=2.

2nd statement: If a particle at rest explodes into 2 particles, then by conservation of momentum,

p1+p2=0\vec{p}_1+\vec{p}_2=0
p1=p2\vec{p}_1=-\vec{p}_2
v1v2\vec{v}_1 \propto -\vec{v}_2

so the velocities of the particles lie in a line (special case of lying in a plane). If we added some momentum p0\vec{p}_0 (perpendicular to the line) to the first particle, then we could restore momentum conservation by adding a third particle with momentum p0-\vec{p}_0. Thus, this counterexample illustrates the velocities of 3 particles do not have to lie in a line. Hence, N2=2N_2=2.

3rd statement: If a particle at rest explodes into 3 particles, then by conservation of momentum,

p1+p2+p3=0\vec{p}_1+\vec{p}_2+\vec{p}_3=0
p1=p2p3\vec{p}_1=-\vec{p}_2-\vec{p}_3

The plane containing p2\vec{p}_2 and p3\vec{p}_3 can be defined by the perpendicular vector n=p2×p3\vec{n}=\vec{p}_2 \times \vec{p}_3. Using the fact that np2=np3=0\vec{n} \cdot \vec{p}_2=\vec{n} \cdot \vec{p}_3=0, we have

np1=n(p2+p3)=np2np3=0\vec{n} \cdot \vec{p}_1=\vec{n} \cdot -(\vec{p}_2+\vec{p}_3)=-\vec{n} \cdot \vec{p}_2-\vec{n} \cdot \vec{p}_3=0

so p1\vec{p}_1 is also perpendicular to n\vec{n} and thus in the plane of p2\vec{p}_2 and p3\vec{p}_3. Hence, the velocities of the particles lie in a plane. If we added some momentum p0\vec{p}_0 (perpendicular to the plane) to the first particle, then we could restore momentum conservation by adding a fourth particle with momentum p0-\vec{p}_0. Thus, this counterexample illustrates the velocities of 4 particles do not have to lie in a plane. Hence N3=3N_3=3.

Combining our results, the answer is C.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Join 259 other subscribers

F=ma Training Program
Group (2026)
Individual (2026)

1D elastic collision 1D inelastic collision 5 kinematics equations Angular kinematics Atwood machine Buoyant force Circular motion Circular orbits Conservation of angular momentum Conservation of energy Conservation of linear momentum Dimensional analysis Effective spring constant Elliptical orbits Energy dissipation Error propagation Fictitious forces Fma: Collisions Fma: Dynamics Fma: Energy Fma: Fluids Fma: Gravity Fma: Kinematics Fma: Oscillatory Motion Fma: Other Fma: Rigid Bodies Fma: System of Masses Forces in mechanics Free fall Inclined plane Kinetic energy Limiting cases Mass-spring system Moments of inertia Motion graphs Newton's laws Power Projectile motion Relative velocity Rolling motion Simple harmonic motion Statics Torque Torque from weight Work-energy theorem

Discover more from Kevin S. Huang

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading